TASK 2 (AGREE OR DISAGREE): NEGATIVE NEWS

The tendency that news reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Sample Answer

The widespread media coverage of heated, controversial, and urgent issues, instead of positive reporting, has sparked fervent debate, with concerned individuals arguing that this tendency is detrimental to both the average person and society at large. I disagree with this statement, albeit with some reservations.

Proponents of this view cite legitimate arguments regarding declining mental health and a distorted social image. They maintain that constant exposure to negative broadcasting—such as perpetual transatlantic wars, frequent instances of police brutality, and failed assassination attempts on renowned politicians—can instill unnecessary fear among members of the general public, thereby leading to chronic anxiety and stress. Over time, this may exacerbate pre-existing symptoms of mental instability, causing paranoia and potentially irreversible psychological damage. Socially, consistent reporting of dire situations can engender a distorted picture of the world. While it is true that violent altercations, animal cruelty, or public indecency often make headlines owing to their sensationalist nature, they do not represent the status quo.

However, these worries can be addressed through raising personal awareness of news coverage and implementing effective regulatory frameworks. Thus, regulated media reporting of negative issues can, on the whole, be beneficial for both individuals and society. For individuals, once informed and vigilant, they can better safeguard themselves against potential dangers and imminent threats. Indeed, media reporting of geopolitical tensions, national healthcare crises, and climate change negotiations, for example, can serve to inform and shape public opinion regarding notable global developments. Similar instances include reports of criminal offences, prison breaks, and homicides, all of which cultivate greater public awareness. Socially, the coverage of sensationalist news tends to appeal to the public more than positive counterparts. For instance, the reporting of a mass murder is likely to attract more views and gain wider circulation than a story about a generous philanthropist. This level of appeal contributes to increased revenue for news outlets, enabling them to hire more employees and thereby indirectly benefiting society.

In conclusion, while the coverage of negative news may contribute to reduced mental health and a distorted public perception, these issues can be mitigated through individual and governmental measures. In my opinion, such reporting ultimately engenders a more informed public and a stronger society by raising awareness and capturing public attention.

Marking by Chat GPT 5

TỪ VỰNG HAY

The tendency that news reports in the media focus on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful for individuals and the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The widespread media coverage of heated, controversial, and urgent issues, instead of positive reporting, has sparked fervent debate, with concerned individuals arguing that this tendency is detrimental to both the average person and society at large. I disagree with this statement, albeit with some reservations.

Proponents of this view cite legitimate arguments regarding declining mental health and a distorted social image. They maintain that constant exposure to negative broadcasting—such as perpetual transatlantic wars, frequent instances of police brutality, and failed assassination attempts on renowned politicians—can instill unnecessary fear among members of the general public, thereby leading to chronic anxiety and stress. Over time, this may exacerbate pre-existing symptoms of mental instability, causing paranoia and potentially irreversible psychological damage. Socially, consistent reporting of dire situations can engender a distorted picture of the world. While it is true that violent altercations, animal cruelty, or public indecency often make headlines owing to their sensationalist nature, they do not represent the status quo.

However, these worries can be addressed through raising personal awareness of news coverage and implementing effective regulatory frameworks. Thus, regulated media reporting of negative issues can, on the whole, be beneficial for both individuals and society. For individuals, once informed and vigilant, they can better safeguard themselves against potential dangers and imminent threats. Indeed, media reporting of geopolitical tensions, national healthcare crises, and climate change negotiations, for example, can serve to inform and shape public opinion regarding notable global developments. Similar instances include reports of criminal offences, prison breaks, and homicides, all of which cultivate greater public awareness. Socially, the coverage of sensationalist news tends to appeal to the public more than positive counterparts. For instance, the reporting of a mass murder is likely to attract more views and gain wider circulation than a story about a generous philanthropist. This level of appeal contributes to increased revenue for news outlets, enabling them to hire more employees and thereby indirectly benefiting society.

In conclusion, while the coverage of negative news may contribute to reduced mental health and a distorted public perception, these issues can be mitigated through individual and governmental measures. In my opinion, such reporting ultimately engenders a more informed public and a stronger society by raising awareness and capturing public attention.

Vocabulary

1. heated, controversial, and urgent issues – vấn đề nóng bỏng, gây tranh cãi và cấp bách
2. fervent debate – cuộc tranh luận sôi nổi
3. detrimental – có hại, bất lợi
4. albeit with some reservations – dù có một vài dè dặt
5. legitimate arguments – lập luận hợp lý/chính đáng
6. declining mental health – sức khỏe tinh thần suy giảm
7. distorted social image – hình ảnh xã hội bị bóp méo
8. perpetual transatlantic wars – các cuộc chiến xuyên Đại Tây Dương kéo dài
9. police brutality – sự tàn bạo của cảnh sát
10. instill unnecessary fear – gieo rắc nỗi sợ hãi không cần thiết
11. chronic anxiety and stress – lo âu và căng thẳng mãn tính
12. exacerbate pre-existing symptoms – làm trầm trọng thêm các triệu chứng sẵn có
13. irreversible psychological damage – tổn hại tâm lý không thể phục hồi
14. engender a distorted picture – tạo ra bức tranh méo mó
15. sensationalist nature – tính giật gân
16. status quo – hiện trạng
17. regulatory frameworks – khung pháp lý/quy định
18. safeguard themselves against potential dangers and imminent threats – tự bảo vệ khỏi nguy hiểm tiềm tàng và mối đe dọa sắp xảy ra
19. geopolitical tensions – căng thẳng địa chính trị
20. cultivate greater public awareness – nuôi dưỡng/nâng cao nhận thức cộng đồng

✔ DÀN Ý

Mở bài

• Truyền thông thường tập trung vào vấn đề nóng bỏng, gây tranh cãi thay vì tin tích cực.
• Quan điểm: không đồng ý hoàn toàn, nhưng có một vài dè dặt.

Thân bài 1 – Lập luận của phe đồng ý (mặt hại)

1. Sức khỏe tinh thần suy giảm: tiếp xúc liên tục với tin tiêu cực → lo âu mãn tính, căng thẳng, tổn hại tâm lý không thể phục hồi.
2. Xã hội méo mó: tin giật gân như bạo lực, thú dữ bị ngược đãi, hành vi đồi bại → tạo ra bức tranh méo mó về thế giới, không phản ánh hiện trạng (status quo).

Thân bài 2 – Phản biện & quan điểm cá nhân (mặt lợi)

1. Có thể khắc phục: qua nâng cao nhận thức cá nhân và khung pháp lý (regulatory frameworks).
2. Lợi ích cho cá nhân: tin tiêu cực giúp con người tự bảo vệ trước nguy hiểm và mối đe dọa sắp xảy ra.
   • Ví dụ: căng thẳng địa chính trị, khủng hoảng y tế, đàm phán khí hậu → định hình nhận thức toàn cầu.
3. Lợi ích cho xã hội:
   • Tin giật gân thu hút hơn tin tích cực → tăng doanh thu, tạo thêm việc làm cho truyền thông.
   • Đồng thời nuôi dưỡng nhận thức cộng đồng.

Kết bài

• Dù tin tiêu cực có thể gây ảnh hưởng xấu tới tinh thần và nhận thức xã hội, nhưng có thể giảm thiểu qua giải pháp cá nhân và chính phủ.
• Cuối cùng, tin tức này vẫn giúp tạo ra một công chúng hiểu biết hơn và một xã hội mạnh mẽ hơn.