In some countries, celebrities complain about the way the media publicize their private lives. Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Sample Answer
In numerous countries worldwide, there have been complaints filed by celebrated individuals regarding the media exposure of their private lives. In stark opposition to this, there are those who contend that individuals should embrace this lifestyle as much as they can, as publicity is inherently an indispensable part of the fame package. I also hold the latter viewpoint while acknowledging the valid reasoning underpinning celebrity privacy protection.
Advocates of shielding famous individuals from outright media intrusion may rightly cite human rights concerns as their groundings. The fact that the media have blatantly exploited numerous aspects of celebrities’ private encounters for attention or commercial gains, these supporters argue, may completely manifest as an infringement upon individual autonomy. Barring moments with full consent, there are instances from celebrities’ daily encounters exploited by media channels that are fraught with pitfalls, vulnerabilities, and embarrassment, which can potentially tarnish their long-cultivated image. Those heralding celebrity rights also raise the valid concerns that since renowned people are simply humans after all, they deserve to have their privacy safeguarded against public curiosity. Failing to uphold this principle, they say, would go against the fundamental tenet of democratic and pluralistic societies, which can in turn give way to public resentment and social destabilisation.
Be that as it may, celebrities are fundamentally different from ordinary people, rendering the aforementioned pro-democracy argument far from fully grounded. Admittedly, severe privacy invasion should by no means be normalised; yet, most acclaimed and renowned individuals have rightfully achieved their fame and attention mainly from popular support, meaning that they should, to some degree, accept that compromised privacy constitutes a sizeable proportion of the fame package. Indeed, to be in the public eye already means to cultivate at least a socially acceptable image, characterised by visually striking presences, rational behaviours, and good moral etiquettes. It goes without saying that their lives should reflect the gravity of this package, and that media, to some extent, has the rights to exploit these to promote them as role models. Plus, most celebrities nowadays have managed to use various multimedia platforms to promote and strengthen their fame. A case in point is the Kardashians, who exploit various aspects of their private lives to gain substantial followers and a firm standing in the entertainment industry. In conclusion, while there are valid human rights groundings to back complaints from celebrities regarding media exposure, I would argue that this is an essential trade-off for fame that should be willingly embraced by famous people. Furthermore, since celebrities use media to gain fame, privacy exposure should, to a degree, be normalised given the current entertainment landscape.
Vocabulary
| complaints filed by celebrated individuals | khiếu nại từ những người nổi tiếng |
| an indispensable part of the fame package | phần không thể thiếu của sự nổi tiếng |
| celebrity privacy protection | bảo vệ quyền riêng tư của người nổi tiếng |
| human rights concerns | mối quan ngại về nhân quyền |
| an infringement upon individual autonomy | sự xâm phạm quyền tự chủ cá nhân |
| pitfalls, vulnerabilities, and embarrassment | cạm bẫy, điểm yếu và sự xấu hổ |
| tarnish their long-cultivated image | làm hoen ố hình ảnh được xây dựng lâu dài |
| the fundamental tenet of democratic and pluralistic societies | nguyên tắc cơ bản của xã hội dân chủ và đa nguyên |
| public resentment and social destabilisation | sự bất mãn của công chúng và bất ổn xã hội |
| severe privacy invasion | sự xâm phạm quyền riêng tư nghiêm trọng |
| acclaimed and renowned individuals | những cá nhân được ca ngợi và nổi tiếng |
| compromised privacy constitutes a sizeable proportion of the fame package | quyền riêng tư bị xâm phạm là một phần lớn của sự nổi tiếng |
| in the public eye | trong tầm nhìn của công chúng |
| socially acceptable image | hình ảnh được xã hội chấp nhận |
| visually striking presences | sự hiện diện nổi bật về mặt hình ảnh |
| rational behaviours | hành vi hợp lý |
| good moral etiquettes | chuẩn mực đạo đức tốt |
| role models | hình mẫu |
| multimedia platforms | nền tảng đa phương tiện |
| substantial followers | lượng người theo dõi đáng kể |
| a firm standing in the entertainment industry | vị thế vững chắc trong ngành giải trí |
| human rights groundings | cơ sở nhân quyền |
| an essential trade-off for fame | sự đánh đổi thiết yếu cho sự nổi tiếng |
| privacy exposure should, to a degree, be normalised | việc công khai đời tư nên được bình thường hóa ở mức độ nào đó |
| current entertainment landscape | bối cảnh giải trí hiện tại |
